Whoosh…whaam…blast

Standard

Due to obviously leading a very busy and important life, this post has been quite a while in the making. I visited the Roy Lichtenstein retrospective in the opening week but nevertheless, the show is still on at Tate Modern and still attracting record numbers of visitors.

Tate Modern

It was obvious that there was going to be a serious “Lichtenstein effect” in fashion this season; as evidenced all over the S/S13 catwalks last September.

Black and White

black and white

black and white

Louis Vuitton and Balmain

Look Mickey

look mickey

mickey catwalk

Marc Jacobs and Meadham Kirchhoff

But when I walked into Topshop last month and saw the way in which they had referenced Lichtenstein I couldn’t help but think what tacky crap it all was! Just for the record, I am usually a Topshop fan but this time I could find few redeeming features in the Lichtenstein/pop-art inspired pieces. It was all far too obvious! You can find cheap Lycra dresses with comic strip writing for a fiver down on the market most days…it’s nothing new.

topshop

It then struck me how many parallels can be drawn between the work of Roy Lichtenstein and high street fashion today. Mainly the ideas of mass consumerism, popular culture and reproduction. Lichtenstein was obsessed with the banale, with the everyday crap of our lives, and he took his inspiration from the whole clichéd, throwaway culture of the times. And now perhaps high street fashion is the most disposable item of all; we buy and dispose of clothing at an alarming rate without a second thought.

hot dog with mustard

Hot Dog with Mustard, 1963

lichtenstein

Step-on Can with Leg, 1961

Another point that can also link Lichtenstein to high street fashion is plagiarism. Lichtenstein was accused of plagiarising comic strips and angered many comic strip artists who felt that his work was merely a rip off of theirs and didn’t deserve the acclaim it received. In response to this some people from the art world would say that he simply used the comics as inspiration and in fact improved them. In a way he took something for the masses and made it more exclusive – the opposite way to how the high street copies catwalk pieces.

whaam

Whaam, 1963 by Lichtenstein and also the original comic strip image above.

At the same time Lichtenstein also did a series of ‘idiot versions’ of famous artworks including pieces by Picasso, Monet and Mondrian. Whereby he would reproduce the famous pieces but in his own recognisable style. He wanted the pieces to deliberately appear ‘flat, impersonal and mechanical,’ taking his source and stamping it with his own distinct identity.

Femme d'Alger

Picasso’s Les femmes d’Alger, 1955 and Lichtenstein’s Femme d’Alger, 1963

So in a sense he took high art and made it more accessible, in a similar vein to how the high street parodies catwalk fashion. The difference being the high street does it in a very ‘copycat’ way, without adding an identity of their own. Whereas Lichtenstein said “the things I have apparently parodied, I actually admire”. If the high street worked with the same sensitivity and appreciation for the original pieces it’s possible we could have more affordable versions of high fashion that are not merely crude, mechanical reproductions, but ones that truly have a merit of their own.

me mickey

Advertisements

One response »

  1. About time you wrote something new
    Alexandra!

    I actually have the Whaam! diptych above my bed and had no idea it was essentially a copy of a specific comic.

    Can’t say I love the Topshop ‘comic inspired’ pieces either.

    Great read, keep ’em coming.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s